bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug binutils/24993] RISC-V: Address 0x00000000000xxxxx is out of bounds


From: wilson at gcc dot gnu.org
Subject: [Bug binutils/24993] RISC-V: Address 0x00000000000xxxxx is out of bounds when "objdump -D"
Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2019 18:34:44 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=24993

Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
   Last reconfirmed|                            |2019-09-12
         Resolution|INVALID                     |---
     Ever confirmed|0                           |1
           Severity|normal                      |enhancement

--- Comment #3 from Jim Wilson <wilson at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
I'm getting compiler bug reports from people using objdump -D, seeing invalid
code in the data section, and then assuming the compiler must be broken and
filing a bug report.  This is causing trouble for me.  I really need people to
stop using objdump -D unless they have a specific need for it.  It is important
to get the message out to the RISC-V user community that using objdump -D is
wrong, and they should be using objdump -d instead.  Unfortunately, I don't
know why so many people are using objdump -D instead of objdump -d.  I suspect
some badly written documentation somewhere.

I agree that the objdump -D output could be improved.  I'd be OK with this as
an enhancement request, but I'm not considering it a bug, as you shouldn't be
using objdump -D in the first place.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]