[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance |
Date: |
Tue, 08 Oct 2019 09:12:05 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25078
Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED
Last reconfirmed| |2019-10-08
CC| |amodra at gmail dot com
Assignee|unassigned at sourceware dot org |amodra at gmail dot com
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #1 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
So I added simple infinite recursion detection to find_abstract_instace for
PR22187. Now someone has crafted a binary to get around that via mutual
recursion. Oh well, I suppose I should have closed the original bug as
wont-fix or fixed the recursion properly.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/25078] New: stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, bugzilla.sourceware at qiushi dot ac.cn, 2019/10/08
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2019/10/08
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, amodra at gmail dot com, 2019/10/08
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in, 2019/10/23
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, nickc at redhat dot com, 2019/10/24
- [Bug binutils/25078] stack overflow in function find_abstract_instance, trupti_pardeshi at persistent dot co.in, 2019/10/24