[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/25371] [objcopy] add support for setting SHF_EXCLUDE flag
|
From: |
i at maskray dot me |
|
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/25371] [objcopy] add support for setting SHF_EXCLUDE flag for sections |
|
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2020 07:39:28 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25371
Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |i at maskray dot me
--- Comment #3 from Fangrui Song <i at maskray dot me> ---
We don't have precedent for +flag or -flag. Isn't it an overkill to invent the
+- prefix and use +exclude and -exclude?
Other than .debug_*.dwo and an LLVM extension .linker-options, I can't think of
any use cases of SHF_EXCLUDE. Nobody will --set-section-flags on .debug_*.dwo .
I'd prefer treating 'exclude' like other flags such as
'alloc','readonly','data'... I can send a patch for this.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.