[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/25491] binutils 2.34 tarball requires makeinfo
From: |
cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/25491] binutils 2.34 tarball requires makeinfo |
Date: |
Sat, 07 Mar 2020 03:07:56 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25491
--- Comment #4 from cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org <cvs-commit at gcc dot
gnu.org> ---
The master branch has been updated by Simon Marchi <address@hidden>:
https://sourceware.org/git/gitweb.cgi?p=binutils-gdb.git;h=9979ab666354f355da46ba826a3efeef9fbb8b24
commit 9979ab666354f355da46ba826a3efeef9fbb8b24
Author: Simon Marchi <address@hidden>
Date: Fri Mar 6 22:06:34 2020 -0500
binutils: doc: move artifacts back to MAINTAINERCLEANFILES
In commit 2b44a6a237 (" binutils: doc: make `make clean` clean more
things"), I moved the doc build artifacts to MOSTLYCLEANFILES, which
made them get removed by "make clean".
Because generating binutils.info requires makeinfo, and we do not want
to require makeinfo when building from the tarball, binutils.info should
not get removed by "make clean" (otherwise, it won't be included in the
tarball).
And to be consistent with other projects (e.g. ld and gas), we also want
to ship the built man pages in the tarball.
This patch puts back all these in MAINTAINERCLEANFILES, so that they are
bundled in the tarball, and only cleaned if you use "make
maintainer-clean".
Tested by building a source release and confirming they are present.
binutils/ChangeLog:
PR 25491
* doc/Makefile.am: Rename MOSTLYCLEANFILES to MAINTAINERCLEANFILES.
* doc/Makefile.in: Re-generate.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.