[Bug gas/25732] test-suite failures with i386-pc-solaris2.11

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=25732

--- Comment #10 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Rainer Orth from comment #8)
> > --- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
> 
> > I stopped checking Solaris cross target since the result isn't clean.
> > If Solaris cross target test becomes clean, I will test Solaris cross
> 
> I doubt I will be able to do much more than the occasional bugfix in
> binutils.  In particular, the bfd and ld code bases remain a complete
> mystery to me.
> 
> > target again.  BTW, you can disable ld for Solaris target by default
> > so that ld test won't run by default.
> 
> No point in that: gld is by far good enough on Solaris to bootstrap and
> test gcc.  It's certainly good to have it for comparisons when
> investigating issues with the Solaris ld.
> 
> Looking at your list of failing ld tests
> 
> FAIL: Build pr20995-2.so
> FAIL: pr20995-2
> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-23a-x86
> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-24a-x86
> FAIL: ld-ifunc/ifunc-25a-x86
> 
> the last three are highly dubious: Solaris ld.so.1 doesn't support ifunc
> and never will, so I'm unsure if those tests can produce useful
> results.  Certainly not if they are runtime tests.

I checked a fix for these IFUNC tests.

> That leaves us with the two pr20995-2 ones...

Does Solaris support GNU_RELRO? If not, I can skip these for Solaris.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.