[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults
From: |
amodra at gmail dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults |
Date: |
Thu, 27 Aug 2020 15:08:10 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=19011
--- Comment #17 from Alan Modra <amodra at gmail dot com> ---
It also fixed these by removing the "zero vma section reloc detected" error,
where no --just-symbols was involved so I'm not sure this is a good thing.
sh-pe +FAIL: objcopy executable (pr25662)
sh-pe -FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (default)
sh-pe -FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (disabled)
sh-pe -FAIL: PE-COFF Long section names in objects (enabled)
sh-pe -FAIL: align1
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/align2a
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/align2b
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/align5
sh-pe -FAIL: ALIGNOF
sh-pe -FAIL: ASSERT
sh-pe +XPASS: ld-scripts/fill16
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/defined2
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/defined3
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/defined4
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/defined5
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/pr24008
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-1
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-2a
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-2b
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3a
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3b
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/empty-address-3c
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/pr22267
sh-pe -FAIL: EXTERN
sh-pe -FAIL: include-1
sh-pe -FAIL: binary logarithm
sh-pe -FAIL: ld-scripts/pr20302
sh-pe +XPASS: SEGMENT_START expression not absolute (default)
sh-pe +XPASS: SEGMENT_START expression not absolute (overridden)
sh-pe -FAIL: SIZEOF
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/26
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/26
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/26
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, amodra at gmail dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults,
amodra at gmail dot com <=
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, nickc at redhat dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, amodra at gmail dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, amodra at gmail dot com, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/27
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2020/08/28
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/28
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/28
- [Bug ld/19011] Issues with ld on mingw-w64 and bad defaults, sourceware-bugzilla at jdrake dot com, 2020/08/28