[Bug ld/27210] ld: Don't suppress foo if foo@v1 is defined

[hjl.tools at gmail dot com]

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27210

--- Comment #6 from H.J. Lu <hjl.tools at gmail dot com> ---
(In reply to Fangrui Song from comment #5)
> The explanation is not convincing. foo and foo@v1 are two different symbols. 
> My example does not use an undefined symbol so I don't see how
> 
> > shouldn't be used by ld to satisfy the unversioned reference.
> 
> is relevant.

In a DSO, only foo and foo@@VERSION can point to the same definition
in .dynsym.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.