[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed
From: |
vries at gcc dot gnu.org |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed |
Date: |
Wed, 10 Feb 2021 10:11:33 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27371
--- Comment #4 from Tom de Vries <vries at gcc dot gnu.org> ---
(In reply to Nick Clifton from comment #3)
> (In reply to Tom de Vries from comment #1)
> Hi Tom,
>
> I do not quite get this:
>
> > - int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, "debug_rnglists") != NULL;
> > + int is_rnglists = strstr (section->name, ".debug_rnglists") != NULL;
>
> The strstr() function locates a sub-string within a a longer string,
> so won't both versions of the code above produce the same results ?
>
> I think that the reason that the test did not include the "." prefix
> was that it is meant to work with compressed range list sections as
> well, ie .zdebug_rnglists.
Hi Nick,
you're right, this is incorrect. Alan had the same comment. I've resubmitted
here: https://sourceware.org/pipermail/binutils/2021-February/115309.html
Thanks,
- Tom
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/27371] New: [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, vries at gcc dot gnu.org, 2021/02/08
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, vries at gcc dot gnu.org, 2021/02/09
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, vries at gcc dot gnu.org, 2021/02/09
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, nickc at redhat dot com, 2021/02/10
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed,
vries at gcc dot gnu.org <=
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2021/02/10
- [Bug binutils/27371] [readelf] .debug_rnglists section header not parsed, vries at gcc dot gnu.org, 2021/02/10