bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug ld/27837] New: Consider allowing mix of -r / --relax by ignoring --


From: slyfox at inbox dot ru
Subject: [Bug ld/27837] New: Consider allowing mix of -r / --relax by ignoring --relax.
Date: Sun, 09 May 2021 22:13:06 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27837

            Bug ID: 27837
           Summary: Consider allowing mix of -r / --relax by ignoring
                    --relax.
           Product: binutils
           Version: 2.36.1
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: normal
          Priority: P2
         Component: ld
          Assignee: unassigned at sourceware dot org
          Reporter: slyfox at inbox dot ru
  Target Milestone: ---

This is a forward of https://bugs.gentoo.org/788901 bug by Petr Ĺ abata.

Petr uses LDFLAGS+=-Wl,--relax system-wide. glibc (and ghc) occasionally use
`ld -r` for partial linking (and apply $LDFLAGS for it). binutils does not
allow such a mix:

  $ touch a.c
  $ LANG=C h gcc -Wl,--relax -r a.c -o a
 
/usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/12.0.0/../../../../x86_64-pc-linux-gnu/bin/ld:
--relax and -r may not be used together
  collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status

Our options are to:
1. Filter out -Wl,--relax flag downstream and don't pass it to glibc
2. Tweak glibc to pass -Wl,--no-relax in `ld -r` contexts

I wonder if binutils could ignore -Wl,--relax altogether for partial linking.

Thank you!

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]