[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined r
From: |
evangelos at foutrelis dot com |
Subject: |
[Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors |
Date: |
Fri, 11 Feb 2022 15:00:41 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=28879
--- Comment #4 from Evangelos Foutras <evangelos at foutrelis dot com> ---
Thank you for looking into this. :)
I applied your diff on top of binutils 2.38 and was able to successfully build
libheif and nextcloud-client with it. Previously, these two Arch Linux packages
(and probably a lot more) would fail to link to several system libraries (x265,
de265, snappy).
PS: Not sure if this is of any importance, but I also noticed the following
linker error when building nextcloud-client with unpatched binutils 2.38
(likely has the same root cause and fix as the undefined references seen
earlier, and this error is gone as well after applying your patch):
/usr/bin/ld: /usr/lib/libQt5Gui.so.5.15.2: unexpected redefinition of
indirect versioned symbol `_ZTI11QSharedData@Qt_5'
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug ld/28879] New: [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, evangelos at foutrelis dot com, 2022/02/10
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, allan at archlinux dot org, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors,
evangelos at foutrelis dot com <=
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, evangelos at foutrelis dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, evangelos at foutrelis dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, evangelos at foutrelis dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, freswa at archlinux dot org, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, hjl.tools at gmail dot com, 2022/02/11
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, evangelos at foutrelis dot com, 2022/02/12
- [Bug ld/28879] [2.38 Regression] ld.bfd: possibly incorrect "undefined reference" errors, cvs-commit at gcc dot gnu.org, 2022/02/13