[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod
From: |
mliska at suse dot cz |
Subject: |
[Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod |
Date: |
Mon, 08 Aug 2022 11:57:39 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=29075
--- Comment #12 from Martin Liska <mliska at suse dot cz> ---
> So in order for -S to work, we either have to add debuginfod support to the
> BFD library or else add a new find_nearest_line() type function to
> binutils/dwarf.c. I wonder which would be the best approach ?
@fche, @mark: Can you please express what would be better out of the 2 options?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod,
mliska at suse dot cz <=
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, mark at klomp dot org, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, fche at redhat dot com, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, fche at redhat dot com, 2022/08/08
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/11
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/15
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/17
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, nickc at redhat dot com, 2022/08/18
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/18
- [Bug binutils/29075] objdump -S does not support debuginfod, amerey at redhat dot com, 2022/08/25