Re: A request to add information on gprofng

[Kurt Goebel]

On 8/9/22 2:44 PM, Ruud van der Pas wrote:
> Hi Nick,
>
> Thanks again for the help with this.
>
> We came up with the following one liner for the list. I've used
> the same HTML format as used for the other entries:
>
>   <li><b>gprofng</b> - Collects and displays application performance data.</li>

   also we might want to change the one liner on 
https://sourceware.org/binutils/ to match the new one above.

   thank you

   Kurt

> Related to this, we were wondering if we can get a gprofng page on
>
> https://sourceware.org/projects.html
>
> We would like to provide practical information to the users, along the
> lines of what the glibc folks are doing:
>
> https://www.gnu.org/software/libc/libc.html
>
> Kind regards, Ruud
>
> > On 9 Aug 2022, at 16:43, Nick Clifton <nickc@redhat.com> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Ruud,
> >
> > > Since we are now part of the GNU binutils 2.39 release, I wonder
> > > if gprofng can be added to the list on the main binutils web site:
> > Doh!  Sorry - this is my bad.  I should have thought to ask you.
> >
> > > https://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
> > > If this is possible, please advise how to proceed.
> > Take a slice of lemon, wrap it around a gold brick and, oh no, sorry,
> > that is the recipe for a pan galactic gargle blaster.  Ahem.
> >
> > If you can tell me what you want to say I will add it to the page.
> > Even better if you can provide me with some HTML formatted text I
> > can just insert it at the proper place.
> >
> > Cheers
> >   Nick