bug-binutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug gas/30120] x87: fucomp assembled as fucom


From: jbeulich at suse dot com
Subject: [Bug gas/30120] x87: fucomp assembled as fucom
Date: Mon, 13 Feb 2023 17:05:38 +0000

https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30120

Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|NEW                         |ASSIGNED

--- Comment #3 from Jan Beulich <jbeulich at suse dot com> ---
(In reply to Michael Matz from comment #2)
> Came in with bd7828084 "x86: use ModR/M for FPU insns with operands".
> 
> The proper Reg field of ModRM for the popping variant of fucom is '5' not
> '4'.
> So this:
> 
> --- a/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> +++ b/opcodes/i386-opc.tbl
> @@ -651,7 +651,7 @@ fcompp, 0xded9, FP, NoSuf, {}
>  fucom, 0xdd/4, i387, Modrm|NoSuf, { FloatReg }
>  // alias for fucom %st(1)
>  fucom, 0xdde1, i387, NoSuf, {}
> -fucomp, 0xdd/4, i387, Modrm|NoSuf, { FloatReg }
> +fucomp, 0xdd/5, i387, Modrm|NoSuf, { FloatReg }
>  // alias for fucomp %st(1)
>  fucomp, 0xdde9, i387, NoSuf, {}
>  fucompp, 0xdae9, i387, NoSuf, {}

Would you mind simply committing your change?

> (didn't check the other insns touched by the patch)

I've just gone through using a pattern I didn't use when composing the change,
and I didn't find any other similar issue.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]