|
From: | sven.koehler at gmail dot com |
Subject: | [Bug binutils/30444] Implementation of COFF/PE format lacks base64 support (Extended COFF Object) |
Date: | Mon, 15 May 2023 19:41:25 +0000 |
https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=30444 --- Comment #10 from Sven <sven.koehler at gmail dot com> --- Created attachment 14883 --> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=14883&action=edit assembly file generated from test.c with x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc (In reply to Jose E. Marchesi from comment #9) > Sven, could you please provide: > > 1) A test.S compiled from test.c. I have a x86_64-w64-mingw binutils built > but not a suitable cross GCC. I will then derive testcases for binutils > starting from that file. Find attached the file test-gcc.s (compressed with xz). It was generated with the command x86_64-w64-mingw32-gcc -fdata-sections -S test.c -o test-gcc.s If you use x86_64-w64-mingw32-as, it will give you the "file too big" error message. > 2) A test.o built with a toolchain that is able to emit //BASE64 names. I > am starting with the BFD support for reading the names. Then will implement > writing support. Please clarify. I already uploaded test-llvm.o. It contains plenty of //BASE64 names. Currently llvm is currently the only toolchain that allows me to create such a file. Is that sufficient? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |