[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bison's semantic parsers
From: |
Hans Aberg |
Subject: |
Re: Bison's semantic parsers |
Date: |
Wed, 11 Oct 2000 14:34:28 +0200 |
At 02.48 -0600 0-10-11, Richard Stallman wrote:
> Isn't it time to switch to C++ when writing Bison?
>
>There will never be such a time. The use of C++ is accepted but
>discouraged in the GNU Project. It is better to use C.
I think you ought to come up with some kind of motivation here: All
langugaes have their cons and pros. As far as C is concerned, it is too low
level for me to spend much time with it. C++ augments this to some extent,
but have other shortcomings, lacking features available in Objective C,
Java, and portable assembler languages. And there is the question on how to
call a C++ program from a program written in another language.
Hans Aberg
- Re: Bison's semantic parsers, Hans Aberg, 2000/10/07
- Re: Bison's semantic parsers, Richard Stallman, 2000/10/11
- Re: Bison's semantic parsers,
Hans Aberg <=
- Re: Bison's semantic parsers, Hans Aberg, 2000/10/12
- Bison and C++, Hans Aberg, 2000/10/14
- Re: Bison and C++, Richard Stallman, 2000/10/15
- Re: Bison and C++, Hans Aberg, 2000/10/15
- Re: Bison and C++, Richard Stallman, 2000/10/16
- Re: Bison and C++, Hans Aberg, 2000/10/16
Re: Bison's semantic parsers, Richard Stallman, 2000/10/11