Re: implicit declaration of function 'yylex' is invalid in C99

[Paul Eggert]

On 1/15/22 08:02, Akim Demaille wrote:
> most of the time it suffices to include something like
>
> %code provides {
>    int yylex (void);
>    void yyerror (const char *);
> }

How about if we mention this in the "Calling Conventions" section of the 
doc? Although the info is present elsewhere, it wasn't in that section 
which is sort of where I expected it.

I installed the attached to do that; please feel free to revise/improve/etc.

0001-doc-improve-calling-convention-doc.patch
Description: Text Data