[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Fwd: gnu/26771: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs
From: |
Larry Jones |
Subject: |
Re: Fwd: gnu/26771: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs |
Date: |
Fri, 13 Sep 2002 11:20:53 -0400 (EDT) |
Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai writes:
>
> are there any plans on getting those modifications in the original CVS
> source or is that deemed outside the scope of the project?
There aren't any plans that I know of, but CVS is maintained by a
very(!) loosely coordinated group of people, so I don't necessarily know
what other people may be planning.
I should have pointed out, however, that Eugene Grosbein overstated the
problem: As of CVS 1.11.1, an unwritable val-tags file just produces a
warning, not a fatal error.
-Larry Jones
I don't need to improve! Everyone ELSE does! -- Calvin
- Fwd: gnu/26771: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai, 2002/09/13
- Re: Fwd: gnu/26771: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs, Larry Jones, 2002/09/13
- Re: Fwd: gnu/26771: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs, Jeroen Ruigrok/asmodai, 2002/09/13
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Eugene Grosbein, 2002/09/16
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Larry Jones, 2002/09/17
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Eugene Grosbein, 2002/09/17
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Larry Jones, 2002/09/17
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Eugene Grosbein, 2002/09/16
- Re: gnu/42726 (Was: cvs checkout bug existing val-tags and readonlyfs), Eugene Grosbein, 2002/09/16