[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
1.12 dev version number
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
Subject: |
1.12 dev version number |
Date: |
Wed, 05 Feb 2003 09:44:30 -0500 |
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 |
I currently have the trunk marked as 1.12.0.1, which is potentially
confusing since previously thius would have meant the dev version
_after_ a 1.12 release.
Any opinions on whether I should:
1. Call it 1.11.99.1 on the premise that we will never reach a stable
1.11.99 release anyhow.
2. Call it 1.12.0.0 and temporarily defy our previous standard,
possibly resulting in some error reporters thinking it okay to
truncate version numbers and report errors in 1.12.
3. Change the standard and call the post 1.12 version 1.12.1.1 on the
premise that it is leading up to 1.12.1.
4. Do something else entirely.
I prefer #3 at the moment but I am still interested in hearing arguments
for alternatives.
Derek
--
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
For sale: One parachute. Never opened. Small stain.
- 1.12 dev version number,
Derek Robert Price <=