Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

[Derek Robert Price]

Brian Murphy wrote:

> > Is the check for `if (!ui)' really necessary here?  In the 
> > HAVE_BROKEN_PAM_APPDATA case does PAM really _sometimes_ pass the 
> > pointer back?
> I don't know. I got this from the apache pam authentication module. I 
> would guess there is
> a patch from Sun which fixes the problem which some users have 
> applied. Perhaps I should
> remove all this stuff until someone runs into this problem on a real 
> system? 


Maybe.  You said Solaris 2.6.  Has Sun distributed patches?  How is 
Apache detecting the situation?  I assume they use configure?

> Thanks for the comments.


Thanks your work on the patch.  :)

Derek

--
               *8^)

Email: derek@ximbiot.com

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
--
Man who run behind car get exhausted.