[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

From: Derek Robert Price
Subject: Re: PAM authentication patch - v2
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:29:23 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20030208 Netscape/7.02

Brian Murphy wrote:

Is the check for `if (!ui)' really necessary here? In the HAVE_BROKEN_PAM_APPDATA case does PAM really _sometimes_ pass the pointer back?

I don't know. I got this from the apache pam authentication module. I would guess there is a patch from Sun which fixes the problem which some users have applied. Perhaps I should remove all this stuff until someone runs into this problem on a real system?

Maybe. You said Solaris 2.6. Has Sun distributed patches? How is Apache detecting the situation? I assume they use configure?

Thanks for the comments.

Thanks your work on the patch.  :)



Email: derek@ximbiot.com

Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
Man who run behind car get exhausted.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]