[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: PAM authentication patch - v2

From: Max Bowsher
Subject: Re: PAM authentication patch - v2
Date: Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:07:50 +0100

Brian Murphy wrote:
>> +@example
>> +cvs auth     required pam_unix.so
>> +cvs account     required pam_unix.so
>> +@end example
>> +
>> +The the equivalent @file{/etc/pam.d/cvs} would contain

What was the consensus about hardcoding "cvs" or using the name cvs was
invoked with as the PAM id?

If the latter, maybe a note about that here?

I can see it possibly confusing people a *lot*.


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]