[Top][All Lists]

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: rdiff

From: Paul Edwards
Subject: Re: rdiff
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2003 10:08:36 GMT

"Derek Robert Price" <derek@ximbiot.com> wrote in message 
> Derek Robert Price wrote:
> > Paul Edwards wrote:
> >
> >> So I hope it passes the sanity.sh.
> >
> >
> > I came up with pretty much exactly what you did, aside from some
> > cleanup and additional error messages, and it seems to fix the problem
> > but it seemed to introduce a new one - the tests are failing in
> > head-trunk-diff.  I'm going to try and look into why today.
> The problem turned out to be that the code at the end of the function
> was expecting only one or no revision specifying argument.  Once these
> changes were made to remove the DIFF_DIFFERENT return, the functions
> assumptions were blown.
> Anyhow, I altered RCS_cmp_file to accept two revisions and to cache the
> first if it checks it out into a file for RCS_exec_diff later.  I'm
> running it through a second sanity check, but I should be checking it in
> shortly.

I noticed the changes on the cvs1-11-x-branch - thanks.

Can you put the phantom "rdiff -s" change on there too?

> No, it was talking about your `id' program being incompatible with the
> script.  It was setting up to match your username in CVS output during
> tests.

I investigated this and found that the man page has a "-u" and "-n"
but not the executable.

The sysadmin reckoned that they must have deleted that option
from the program, and the man page was out of date.  Yeah, right.

BFN.  Paul.

reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]