bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: Problem with configure falsely detecting presence of systemroutines(


From: Kelly F. Hickel
Subject: RE: Problem with configure falsely detecting presence of systemroutines(while porting to NSK)
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 21:47:14 -0500

Yep, well, I've already gotten the code done, and have tested it
separately, so I'm not too worried about that.  I could hand edit
config-h to make it work, but since it will take a lot of iterations,
and each iteration takes quite awhile (it's not a fast machine, at least
not for this), that's not too productive!

-Kelly

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Paul Edwards [mailto:kerravon@nosppaam.w3.to]
> Sent: Saturday, September 27, 2003 9:30 PM
> To: bug-cvs@gnu.org
> Subject: Re: Problem with configure falsely detecting presence of
> systemroutines(while porting to NSK)
> 
> "Kelly F. Hickel" <kfh@mqsoftware.com> wrote in message
> news:mailman.818.1064714240.21628.bug-cvs@gnu.org...
> > There should be a way to make the linker act like I want it too
(seems
> > like just putting it into static mode should do the trick, but it
hasn't
> > worked that way yet), but I haven't found it yet, and the reams of
> > manuals (and the software I could use to access them online) are at
the
> > office, so I can't use them until Monday.
> 
> > Anyone have any bright ideas?
> 
> My bright idea is to make the change to CVS 1.10.x in the way
> described (ie keeping the code out of the main .c files and hiving
> it off into subr.c), and get that to work first.  ie no changes, just
> additional code.
> 
> That same code will fit into CVS 1.11.6 without causing
> any errors (errors to Unix, Mac etc).
> 
> The problem of CVS 1.11.6 not auto-configuring for Tandem
> is a separate problem which can be solved separately.
> 
> BFN.  Paul.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cvs mailing list
> Bug-cvs@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs




reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]