bug-cvs
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Detecting case-insensitivity revisited


From: Matthew Doar
Subject: Re: Detecting case-insensitivity revisited
Date: 06 Oct 2003 12:35:03 -0700

Sounds like the right way to go. Default is case-sensitive, I presume.
There might be some oddnesses involved if a repository went from one
mode to another, for instance when bringing a backup up on a standby
machine incorrectly.

~Matt

On Mon, 2003-10-06 at 10:57, Derek Robert Price wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> Hey all,
> 
> Mark and Larry and I were having a discussion about detecting
> case-insensitive file systems some time back and we couldn't come up
> with a simple and elegant solution.  The main problem is that even
> though we can classify systems as USUALLY case-sensitive or case
> insensitive, this varies by the filesystem actually being used.  On
> Windows this isn't usually a problem, but on Mac OS X, for instance,
> admins can install case-sensitive UFS file systems.  On Linux, admins
> could similarly access NTFS or FAT32 file systems for example.
> 
> Rather than going to the trouble of trying to autodetect these
> scenarios, what about making this a global option to CVS (e.g. --case or
> - --nocase) with the default determined by the system compiled on rather
> than having the value used hard coded at compile time.  This could be an
> option in CVSROOT/config too, for servers.
> 
> Derek
> 
> - --
> ~                *8^)
> 
> Email: derek@ximbiot.com
> 
> Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
> 
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Netscape - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
> 
> iD8DBQE/gaz7LD1OTBfyMaQRAnaYAKCNa81of7J4tLQgQQouAQgl+NkTdgCeK81q
> vcizK5IhaFEwKt/KQxXwArY=
> =SAT0
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> 
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bug-cvs mailing list
> Bug-cvs@gnu.org
> http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-cvs





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]