Re: EMX on DOS

[Paul Edwards]

"Larry Jones" <lawrence.jones@eds.com> wrote in message 
news:mailman.2954.1067746232.21628.bug-cvs@gnu.org...
> > In filesubr.c, some of the calls to S_ISLNK have a #ifdef
> > around them, and some don't.  S_ISBLK was also an unresolved
> > reference on my system.
>
> That's interesting, S_ISLNK and S_ISBLK both seem to be required by
> POSIX -- are you sure your system is POSIX compliant?  Does your
> <sys/stat.h> have S_IFLNK and S_IFBLK?  What about S_ISCHR and S_IFCHR?

I don't think EMX for DOS is Posix compliant.

It is Cygwin that I was under the impression was Posix
compliant (this is the one I was disappointed there was no
"general posix" compile procedure for).

But anyway, EMX for DOS has S_ISCHR and S_IFCHR.

BFN.  Paul.