[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Question: Windows Build - feature branch, lib directory
|
From: |
Derek Robert Price |
|
Subject: |
Re: Question: Windows Build - feature branch, lib directory |
|
Date: |
Sat, 15 May 2004 14:15:14 -0400 |
|
User-agent: |
Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040413 |
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Conrad T. Pino wrote:
>Hi Derek,
>
>>From: Derek Robert Price
>>Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 09:45
>>
>>As no one has been spending much time maintaining these build files, I
>>would say that they don't have very well-defined goals.
>>
>>To adapt the style we have been using for UNIX build files, I would say
>>that it would be best if the local build file in any given directory too
>>as much responsibility as possible for building files in its directory.
>>When in doubt, please look at what the UNIX build files are doing and
>>try and mimic the behavior as much as possible.
>
>
>IMO we're there on feature & stable. Thanks for the direction & support.
>
>It took more than a month to do it. Are time frames like this typical?
It depends on the change, what else is happening, and how much time
the parties involved have. IIRC, you were out of touch for two weeks
of that month.
Derek
- --
*8^)
Email: derek@ximbiot.com
Get CVS support at <http://ximbiot.com>!
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFApl4xLD1OTBfyMaQRAq32AKCUf21YUNIUO4e4ROHCW1fjae+S1QCfcM82
Gg0hYTSxnjiPa11xWK8VZ/A=
=nDU3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----