[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: advisory locks patch
From: |
Paul Gelderblom (ptok) |
Subject: |
Re: advisory locks patch |
Date: |
Mon, 27 Sep 2004 21:01:47 +0200 |
> I've completely rewritten the patch. I really didn't like overloading
> and parsing M responses (user messages) from the server when we have
> control of the client/server protocol. The basic functionality is still
> the same, except that now failed edits will not block an entire command
> but will only cause a single file to be skipped with a warning.
>
Does this re-write of the protocol also imply incompatibility with other
clients
that implement the "Noel Yap" version of the patch?
That might mean that we loose compatibility with cvsnt-based clients.
(including
wincvs and TortoiseCvs).
Paul Gelderblom