[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: silence type complaints about signal vs. atexit handlers
From: |
Conrad T. Pino |
Subject: |
RE: silence type complaints about signal vs. atexit handlers |
Date: |
Fri, 1 Oct 2004 13:10:48 -0700 |
Hi Martin,
This topic has some history that I've referenced for you.
As far as I can tell multiple proposals I made back in
April & May 2004 are stalled for lack of a consensus.
At that time Derek Price, Larry Jones & Jim Hyslop were
commenting.
The topic came up again in September 2004 discussing all
the Windows build warnings. Derek Price & Mark Baushke
commented at that time. I haven't followed up on
September 2004 discussion.
As far as I can tell the GNU BUG CVS archive is pretty
complete. If any messages in the various thread are
missing I can republish them if so requested.
The April 2004 thread was broken up into 2 parts in archive:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2004-04/msg00041.html
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2004-04/msg00151.html
The May 2004 thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2004-05/msg00271.html
The September 2004 thread:
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-cvs/2004-09/msg00044.html
Conrad
- Prev by Date:
Fw: Fw: @D!PEX, L!P!t0r, ZYB@N, PR0PEC!@, Z0L0FT, PR0Z@C, D!@ZEP@M, X@N@X, V@L!UM, S0M@, @MB!EN, V!C0D!N, ULTR@M, TR@M@D0L, HYDR0C0D0NE, F!0R!CET, C!@L!S, V!@GR@, PHENTERM!NE, MER!D!@ 9q
- Next by Date:
Re: Urgent Business Proposal
- Previous by thread:
silence type complaints about signal vs. atexit handlers
- Next by thread:
Propagate s/size_t/int/ in buffer_read_short_line() et al.
- Index(es):