Re: cvs abusing stderr?

[Harald Dunkel]

gnu-cvs@regnis.de wrote:
> Just to prevent an out-of-the-brain change: if they would we sent to
> stdout, this would break at least SmartCVS.
> 

I don't want to break your GUI, but I am sure that it can
read from cvs' stdout instead of stderr, too.

Wouldn't it be more consistent to reserve stderr for
error messages, and to write log messages to stdout,
as usual?


Regards

Harri