Re: sanity.sh and dotest_lit

[Mark D. Baushke]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Jim Hyslop <jhyslop@dreampossible.ca> writes:

> The test deep-4 calls dotest_lit instead of dotest. Can anyone see any
> problems with converting it to use dotest instead of dotest_lit?

The dotest_lit function was introduced in cvs 1.9 for tests deep-4,
branches-3, multibranch-3. For cvs 1.8.1, there was no dotest_lit
function and no multibranch-3 test, but deep-4 and branches-3 both used
the dotest function.

I don't have any great objections to moving back to dotest, but I
suspect that the comparison will not be as exact as the current test.

        -- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.3 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFEmkvvCg7APGsDnFERAtPeAKCGa8idDzjmtCg/f8l+FJTk8FHhQQCfS+Ta
Bj0I89ZjObdrY+gkB1loHT8=
=ubZd
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----