Re: Proposed branch tag performance patch for feature

[Mark D. Baushke]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Larry Jones <lawrence.jones@ugs.com> writes:

> Mark D. Baushke writes:
> > 
> > I'm sending you back the patches that I might
> > consider committing (modulo the ChangeLog entry
> > which I did not touch).
> 
> I strongly object to committing any of this to the stable branch until
> it has been thoroughly tested on feature.  This is a radical change to
> core functionality that is purely an enhancement, not a bug fix, and has
> very high risk (in my opinion) of breaking something due to a subtle
> nuance that we haven't considered.

I agree.

I have ported the patch to FEATURE and will commit there if it passes
all of the sanity checks. The diff for this variation of the patch is in
another email. Please advise if you see anything suspecious looking.

        Thanks,
        -- Mark
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (FreeBSD)

iD8DBQFFnJ3LCg7APGsDnFERAoJIAJ0T+kDCBFQ1mz6y/MQZLAst+JzO1gCgtPAV
R36Fov0YUKAahJfH9oWPo5o=
=WYh9
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----