[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Bug-cvs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2
From: |
David O'Brien |
Subject: |
Re: Bug-cvs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2 |
Date: |
Sat, 3 May 2008 19:38:02 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Mutt/1.5.16 (2007-06-09) |
On Fri, May 02, 2008 at 12:01:23PM -0400, bug-cvs-request@nongnu.org wrote:
> It does the same thing even without the rm. Updating to a particular
> revision (whether numeric or symbolic) *always* sets a sticky tag to
> that revision. What makes you think BASE should be special?
1. Its rather useless if that's proper behavior.
'cvs up -r BASE' should give you back the same file you had checked
out - for instance if you hacked the file to pieces and just want
the original file back.
2. mdb said so.
--
-- David (obrien@FreeBSD.org)
- Re: Bug-cvs Digest, Vol 52, Issue 2,
David O'Brien <=