Re: [bug-diffutils] [PATCH 16/19] build: use more gnulib modules

[Jim Meyering]

Eric Blake wrote:
>> Eric Blake wrote:
>>> Use of nanosleep requires linking with $(LIB_NANOSLEEP) on some platforms.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>> I know, and I should have added it there,
>> but it was indeed added in a later patch, along
>> with several others.
>
> But one other question - where does diffutils even use nanosleep to need
> to pull in this module in the first place?

Good catch, I think.

I'm at a loss.
I wouldn't have pulled it in just for fun...
Yet I see no reason to include it.

And with the following patch, everything seems to work, so...
Thank you.

>From e90c254a0ebafd26a0ea07e2ec3867c539947f63 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jim Meyering <address@hidden>
Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2009 22:30:41 +0100
Subject: [PATCH] maint: don't pull in gnulib's nanosleep unnecessarily

* bootstrap.conf (gnulib_modules): Remove nanosleep.  Not needed.
Spotted by Eric Blake.
---
 bootstrap.conf |    1 -
 1 files changed, 0 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-)

diff --git a/bootstrap.conf b/bootstrap.conf
index 2a3fd48..d26ec9e 100644
--- a/bootstrap.conf
+++ b/bootstrap.conf
@@ -51,7 +51,6 @@ manywarnings
 mbrtowc
 mkstemp
 mktime
-nanosleep
 progname
 propername
 regex
--
1.6.5.3.433.g11067