bug-fileutils
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Bug-fileutils] "mv" command -- Unexpected Behavior on Linux


From: Steve Kann
Subject: Re: [Bug-fileutils] "mv" command -- Unexpected Behavior on Linux
Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2000 11:51:29 -0400
User-agent: Mutt/1.2i

On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 11:39:12AM -0400, Lenny Mastrototaro wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 20, 2000 at 09:21:27AM +0200, Jim Meyering wrote:
> > Thanks for the report.
> > There is a bug in mv from fileutils-4.0 that would strike
> > when moving a directory into itself.
> >
> > You mention 4.0p.  However, not all of the reports in this thread
> > appear to be using that version.  In particular, this message
> >   mv: web/web/d1: won't create hard link `web/web' to directory `(null)'
> > must have been produced by an earlier version (probably 4.0).
> 
> Jim,
> 
> As you suspect, I was using:
> 
>     $ mv --version
>     
>         mv (GNU fileutils) 4.0 
>     
> which is what `ships' with Redhat Linux 6.1 in the rpm fileutils-4.0-8.
> Redhat Linux 6.2 ships with 4.0 as well in the rpm fileutils-4.0-21.

Actually, RedHat's 6.2 uses 4.0p, which is the version I had:

        address@hidden:~/work/MS/docu0010 $ rpm -q fileutils
        fileutils-4.0-21

        address@hidden:~/work/MS/docu0010 $ mv --version
        mv (GNU fileutils) 4.0p
        Written by Mike Parker, David MacKenzie, and Jim Meyering.

Thanks again, Jim, for the quick response!

-SteveK

-- 
  Steve Kann - Chief Engineer - 520 8th Ave #2300 NY 10018 -  (212) 533-1775
                HorizonLive.com - collaborate . interact . learn
   "The box said 'Requires Windows 95, NT, or better,' so I installed Linux."


reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]