[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:44:48 -0700
"Daniel A. Palm" wrote:
> Maybe I'm crazy or doing something wrong, but I swear that the -S option in
> the 'du' utility
> doesnt do what it is supposed to. It is supposed to not show the
> but it still does. The output of 'du' is the same as 'du -S' I think.
> I'm using RedHat 7.0
> on an i386.
> -Dan Palm
I think that the -S option is used to exclude
the amount of subdirectory bytes in the total.
Well, at least, that's what it does :-)
Yoda:/home/matthew/libxml-1.8.11/doc>$ /usr/local/bin/du -S
- du, Daniel A. Palm, 2001/04/10
- Re: du,
Matthew Schalit <=
- Re: du, Bob Proulx, 2001/04/15