[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Sun, 15 Apr 2001 15:01:24 -0600
> Maybe I'm crazy or doing something wrong, but I swear that the -S
> option in the 'du' utility doesnt do what it is supposed to. It is
> supposed to not show the subdirectories but it still does. The
> output of 'du' is the same as 'du -S' I think.
I think you are confusing the -S and -s options.
do not include size of subdirectories
display only a total for each argument
I think what you are looking for is 'du -s' which won't show all of
the subdirectories but will only show you the 's'ummary for the entire
disk tree below.
- du, Daniel A. Palm, 2001/04/10
- Re: du, Matthew Schalit, 2001/04/10
- Re: du,
Bob Proulx <=