[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Possible bug in 'ls' command version 4.0p
From: |
Richard Tango-Lowy |
Subject: |
Possible bug in 'ls' command version 4.0p |
Date: |
Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:29:44 -0400 |
I was searching for the file ".foo" in my filesystem and found the
following curious behavior:
ls -a *foo* lists nothing (a surprise to me!)
ls -a .*foo* lists .foo, as expected.
I would think that the -a option should cause ls to list the hidden
file, even though I'm not actually specifying the dot. I noticed that ls
on HP-UX has the same behavior, but it certainly seems non-intuitive.
Sincerely,
-- Rich Tango-Lowy
.
. o . Richard F. Tango-Lowy
o 0 o (877) 606-6759
0 0 address@hidden
. o 0 0 o .
0 0 AGILENT TECHNOLOGIES
o 0 o ___________________________
. o . IT | Information Technology
.
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- Possible bug in 'ls' command version 4.0p,
Richard Tango-Lowy <=