[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du)
From: |
Matthias Schniedermeyer |
Subject: |
Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du) |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Jan 2003 16:24:03 +0100 (CET) |
Hi
> OK. Here we go.
>
> Make it an option, and it might just be usefull. Changing the default
> is silly since most files tend to be far smaller than 1GB, and this
> just wastes precious space on the screen. Would you like to do this?
>
> You could look at the some of the output formating switches to see how
> it is done for similar things.
Here we go. again.
Bis denn
--
Real Programmers consider "what you see is what you get" to be just as
bad a concept in Text Editors as it is in women. No, the Real Programmer
wants a "you asked for it, you got it" text editor -- complicated,
cryptic, powerful, unforgiving, dangerous.
broader_sizes.diff
Description: Text document
- Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/15
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du),
Matthias Schniedermeyer <=
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Alfred M. Szmidt, 2003/01/16
- Re: Size for Size is too small (ls/du), Matthias Schniedermeyer, 2003/01/16