[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: cost of popen()
From: |
Hideki IWAMOTO |
Subject: |
Re: cost of popen() |
Date: |
Fri, 17 Jun 2005 22:58:09 +0900 |
On Fri, 17 Jun 2005 16:01:14 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote...
> Currently, the interface is in command layer. This brings the performance
> problem to gtags, because the command call far costs than the function call.
> To solve the problem, we should move the interface from the command layer
> to the function layer, that is, links gtags-parser as part of gtags.
Does this mean stopping supporting plug-in parser?
>
> What do you think?
----
Hideki IWAMOTO address@hidden
- cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/15
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/15
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/16
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/16
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(),
Hideki IWAMOTO <=
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/17
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/19
- Re: cost of popen(), Hideki IWAMOTO, 2005/06/19
- Re: cost of popen(), Shigio Yamaguchi, 2005/06/19