Re: cost of popen()

[Hideki IWAMOTO]

On Mon, 04 Jul 2005 21:56:29 +0900, Shigio Yamaguchi wrote...
> By the way, I began to feel the doubt in the current implementation
> using plug-in parser again. If only giving up plug-in parser, we can
> make simpler, more efficient gtags without any external commands.
> I will make another proposal later, it is a story in the future though.

Would you add built-in parser to plans.html, in order to clarify
the priority of built-in parser?

I think that the first purpose of using built-in parser is reducing 
reading GTAGS from defined(). Is this right?

----
Hideki IWAMOTO  address@hidden