[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: No forward definitions of classes
|
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
|
Subject: |
Re: No forward definitions of classes |
|
Date: |
Tue, 02 Oct 2007 21:16:03 +0900 |
Hi,
> I think, they should not be stored at all. There may be situations, where
> something that looks like a forward definition is something different (an
> empty type definition for some template magic), but in general it is just to
> avoid an include and is nothing anyone wishes to search for.
>
> For functions the situation is different.
I understand well. Thank you very much.
--
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3