[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link
From: |
Shigio YAMAGUCHI |
Subject: |
Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link |
Date: |
Mon, 14 Jan 2008 23:28:09 +0900 |
> Maybe you don't want to follow links that go out of the source tree (eg.
> /usr/include or whatever), but then you have to check every path component
> (boring but possible).
It is likely.
But if user want to do so, it should be accepted.
> But worse, symlinks can create loops:
>
> $ ln -s .. foo
Right. Maybe we can do nothing but believe that the user
wants to do something meaningful. :)
--
Shigio Yamaguchi <address@hidden> - Tama Communications Corporation
PGP fingerprint: D1CB 0B89 B346 4AB6 5663 C4B6 3CA5 BBB3 57BE DDA3
- [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/13
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Jean-Marc Saffroy, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link,
Shigio YAMAGUCHI <=
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Jean-Marc Saffroy, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/14
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Hideki IWAMOTO, 2008/01/15
- Re: [RFC] Treatment of symbolic link, Shigio YAMAGUCHI, 2008/01/15