[Top][All Lists]
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation
From: |
Mike Warren |
Subject: |
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation |
Date: |
24 Jan 2001 20:15:49 -0700 |
User-agent: |
Gnus/5.0807 (Gnus v5.8.7) XEmacs/21.1 (20 Minutes to Nikko) |
"Imran Ghory" <address@hidden> writes:
> I'm not saying that an article should be moderated to say "factual",
> rather "This article was voted on as being non-"factually biased",
> this should not be taken to mean that this article is necessarily
> true rather that the body voting on it could not see a bias in this
> article"
I agree that such a classification of articles would be useful.
I disagree that it should go into the actual article repository. None
of this type of meta-data should appear in the repository. Remember,
the goal is to produce a wide array of FDL-licensed content; is
classifying it now going to make sense later (i.e. 10, 20, 50 years
from now)? The answer, I think, is no and hence such classification
data shouldn't appear in the repository of articles.
--
address@hidden
<URL:http://www.mike-warren.com>
GPG: 0x579911BD :: 87F2 4D98 BDB0 0E90 EE2A 0CF9 1087 0884 5799 11BD
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, (continued)
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Bryce Harrington, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Mike Warren, 2001/01/23
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Imran Ghory, 2001/01/24
- Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation,
Mike Warren <=
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Rob Scott, 2001/01/21
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23
Re: [Bug-gnupedia] A system of moderation, Tom Chance, 2001/01/23