|
From: | Christopher Mahan |
Subject: | Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia |
Date: | Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:27:56 -0800 |
As far as the post being an updated version, it would not necessarily supercede my entry. There would now just be two versions of the original. Under GFDL, are they required to indicate who the author is of the parts they copied or paraphrased?
And if there is no moderation, how do we deal with blatant copyright issues? Would GNE be liable, or would the author be liable?
If a large nameless corporation (aren't they all) was to get all puffed up about some article sounding a lot like one of their own, then what is the process that GNE would use to find the author and perhaps remove the article, or would GNE just say: "Tough, sue us" to the now-looming nameless corporation?
Because if anyone could order GNE to remove an article, then I suppose the whole point of a censorship-free resource would be moot.
I suppose that GNE should have the means to investigate copyright claims, and perhaps find the ACLU or some organization of that nature be willing to help us defend "freedom" with a big F.
Here. I go on again... Chris
From: Aaron Swartz <address@hidden> Reply-To: address@hidden To: <address@hidden> Subject: Re: [Bug-gne]Right/Wrong if editorship in GNE/Nupedia Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2001 19:38:38 -0600 Christopher Mahan <address@hidden> wrote:> If someone has a beef with an article, let them write their own, hopefully> better. I would rather have both these people's views. Or they could correct your article and post the corrected version, right? The GFDL allows this freedom -- won't GNE? -- [ Aaron Swartz | address@hidden | http://www.aaronsw.com ] _______________________________________________ Bug-gne mailing list address@hidden http://mail.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-gne
_________________________________________________________________ Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
[Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread] |