bug-gnu-arch
[Top][All Lists]
Advanced

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5588] Rename logs -> log-versions and log-ls -> log


From: nobody
Subject: [Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #5588] Rename logs -> log-versions and log-ls -> logs
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 03:27:46 -0400
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.4b) Gecko/20030519 Mozilla Firebird/0.6

=================== BUG #5588: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5588&group_id=4899

Submitted by: miles                   Project: GNU arch -- a revision control 
system
Submitted on: Sat 09/27/2003 at 16:27
Category:  tla                        Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  small feature idea        Resolution:  None                     
Status:  Open                         Release:  
address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-183
Fixed Release:  address@hidden/tla--devo--1.1--patch-33Merge Request?:  yes -- 
merge from my archive
Your Archive Name:  address@hidden Archive Location:  
http://arch.linuxguru.net/~miles/address@hidden
Assigned to:  None                    

Summary:  Rename logs -> log-versions and log-ls -> logs

Original Submission:  * Rename the `logs', `add-log' and `remove-log' commands 
to `log-versions', `add-log-version' and `remove-log-version'.



* Rename the `log-ls' command to `logs'.



* Do a similar renaming of internal functions.



This is the change I posted about on the mailing list, plus additional changes 
to the `add/remove-log' commands, and internal equivalents.



While doing this patch, I realized that things are more involved than I thought 
-- the term `log' is used sort of schizophrenically within the tla source; its 
general meaning seems to have changed over time from referring to the set of 
patch-log-entries for a given version, to referring to a particular entry.



This patch makes the usage consistant by preferring the latter usage, and using 
the term `log version' to refer to the set of logs for a version.  This usage 
-- at least using `log' to mean a single entry -- seems to be what's used when 
people talk about the concept on the mailing list.



I don't know if this is exactly the right change, but I think that terms ought 
to at least be used consistently (it was fairly confusing before, I think).



[I've also made corresponding changes to the documentation, which I'll post as 
a separate bug.]





No Followups Have Been Posted


CC list is empty


No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=5588&group_id=4899

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/





reply via email to

[Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread]