[Bug-gnu-arch] [bug #6543] default tagging should be precious

[nobody]

=================== BUG #6543: LATEST MODIFICATIONS ==================
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=6543&group_id=4899

Changes by: Anonymous user        Date: Fri 11/14/03 at 04:28

------------------ Additional Follow-up Comments ----------------------------
Sorry for the preceding anonymous comment, I forgot to

mention that "I" stands for "rfarine". But you could probably

have guessed ;).





=================== BUG #6543: FULL BUG SNAPSHOT ===================


Submitted by: walters                 Project: GNU arch -- a revision control 
system
Submitted on: Thu 11/13/03 at 18:44
Category:  None                       Severity:  5 - Major                  
Bug Group:  None                      Resolution:  None                     
Status:  Open                         Release:                              
Fixed Release:  tla--mainline--1.1--patch-{42,44}Merge Request?:  yes -- merge 
from my archive
Your Archive Name:  address@hidden Archive Location:  
http://arch.verbum.org/arch
Assigned to:  None                    

Summary:  default tagging should be precious

Original Submission:  Hi,  I really think the default untagged-source behavior 
should be precious, not unrecognized.  Precious more closely simulates CVS' 
default behavior here, and I think it makes more sense as a default, since it's 
what the vast majority of users (I assert) will expect.



This change is in both patch-42 and patch-44 in my archive; please apply both.



Follow-up Comments
*******************

-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 11/14/03 at 04:28         By: None
Sorry for the preceding anonymous comment, I forgot to

mention that "I" stands for "rfarine". But you could probably

have guessed ;).



-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Fri 11/14/03 at 04:23         By: None
I really think that it should remain "unrecognized". With

anything but unrecognized, if you forget to add a tag then

tree-lint will be silent and you'll end up comitting an

inconsistent changeset.



In general, the default should select the safest behavior,

not the apparently "friendly" one.



-------------------------------------------------------
Date: Thu 11/13/03 at 19:56         By: robertc
this also needs integration with the subdir regexp code.


CC List
*******

CC Address                          | Comment
------------------------------------+-----------------------------
address@hidden             | 



No files currently attached


For detailed info, follow this link:
http://savannah.gnu.org/bugs/?func=detailbug&bug_id=6543&group_id=4899

_______________________________________________
  Message sent via/by Savannah
  http://savannah.gnu.org/