[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Futile bug reports?
From: |
Alan Mackenzie |
Subject: |
Re: Futile bug reports? |
Date: |
16 Aug 2001 22:14:21 +0200 |
Date: |
Thu, 16 Aug 2001 10:54:24 +0000 |
User-agent: |
tin/1.4.5-20010409 ("One More Nightmare") (UNIX) (Linux/2.0.35 (i686)) |
deja8501 <procmail@freemail.hu> wrote on 8 Aug 2001 23:04:06 -0700:
> rms@gnu.org (Richard Stallman) wrote in message
> news:<200108082315.RAA11829@aztec.santafe.edu>...
[ .... ]
>> Meanwhile, venting your anger with terms like "FSF Emacs" is not
>> likely to make us want to communicate with you more.
> I didn't want to sound angry or offensive. English is not my mother
> tongue therefore I sometimes cannot express my thoughts properly. I
> wanted to be constructive, that's why I suggested setting up a bug
> tracking system
> I'm what you can call a free software enthusiast. I use FSF Emacs all
> the time and I want to make it better with my bug reports.
Er, what Richard was unhappy about was the term "FSF Emacs". Apparently,
this has somehow become a term of abuse when referring to Emacs, but I
don't understand why. If you use the name "GNU Emacs" instead, everybody
will be happy, I think.
[ .... ]
> Tom
--
Alan Mackenzie (Munich, Germany)
Email: aacm@muuc.dee; to decode, wherever there is a repeated letter
(like "aa"), remove one of them (leaving, say, "a").
- Re: Futile bug reports?, (continued)
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/23
- Re: Futile bug reports?, David desJardins, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/24
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Kevin Gallagher, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/26
- Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/10
- Re: Futile bug reports?,
Alan Mackenzie <=
Re: Futile bug reports?, Eli Zaretskii, 2001/08/10
Re: Futile bug reports?, David R. Linn, 2001/08/14
Re: Futile bug reports?, Richard Stallman <address@hidden>, 2001/08/16
Re: Futile bug reports?, Bill Richter, 2001/08/19