[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: broken `sigblock' defns
From: |
Golubev I. N. |
Subject: |
Re: broken `sigblock' defns |
Date: |
Thu, 01 Nov 2001 12:17:56 (GMT) |
> Is SCO 5 the only one, or do you know about others?
Never tried to build 21.1 for other systems. Gimme time.
> What compilation failure did that cause?
emacs.c: In function `main':
emacs.c:994: `sigprocmask_set' undeclared (first use in this function)
emacs.c:994: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once
emacs.c:994: for each function it appears in.)
gmake[1]: *** [emacs.o] Error 1
> Is it possible that the specific
> platform(s) where you saw the problem could define POSIX_SIGNALS in
> their s/*.h headers, and avoid messing with this issue altogether?
No. "s/sco5.h" states explicitly that it needs to `#undef
POSIX_SIGNALS'.