[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties
From: |
Eli Zaretskii |
Subject: |
Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties |
Date: |
Wed, 14 Nov 2001 14:00:34 +0200 |
On 13 Nov 2001, Kevin Layer wrote:
> That is, seeing a value returned from buffer-substring of
>
> #("(def" 0 1 (fontified t) 1 4 (face font-lock-keyword-face fontified t))
>
> instead of "(def" is freaking out the software I'm "porting" to emacs
> 21.
How is it ``freaking out'' your code, exactly? Can you show an
example of such breakage? Perhaps there's a way to do what you want
without switching to buffer-substring-no-properties. AFAIK, the Emacs
primitives generally DTRT even though properties are there.
- buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/13
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/13
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties,
Eli Zaretskii <=
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Miles Bader, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Stefan Monnier, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/15
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Miles Bader, 2001/11/15
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Kevin Layer, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Per Abrahamsen, 2001/11/14
- Re: buffer-substring vs. buffer-substring-no-properties, Peter S Galbraith, 2001/11/14