Re: An idea: controlling the order of execution of elisp hook functions

[Peter S Galbraith]

>     I could see a use for finer-grained control that would depend less on
>     the order in which the 'add-hook' calls were made.  An optional priority
>     could be an integer between 1 and 100 (or whatever) defaulting to 50.
> 
> If we have to extend this feature, it would be better to do it by
> defining multiple hooks which have a defined relationship.  But now it
> seems there is no need.  I think we should rejoice that the existing
> simple features appear to be adequate.

Good call.