[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
gmt-manpages: man (l) vs man (1) vs. e.g. emacs' M-x man
From: |
Dan Jacobson |
Subject: |
gmt-manpages: man (l) vs man (1) vs. e.g. emacs' M-x man |
Date: |
Tue, 18 Mar 2003 05:08:06 +0800 |
Package: gmt-manpages
Version: 3.4-1
Severity: minor
$From: Paul Wessel <pwessel@hawaii.edu>
$To: Dan Jacobson <jidanni@dman.ddts.net>
$
$>on those manpages SEE ALSO sections, l is used where 1 should be,
$>e.g.: fitcircle(l). This breaks emacs' M-x man.
$>
$But that is true of all GMT man pages as they are supposed to go in
$man/manl. Perhaps the emacs macro is broken...
No, on debian they are put into man1 and there is no manl. I am
sending this to the debian gmt-manpages package maintainer to see what
he wants to do about this, if anything.
True, emacs' M-x man command could look in more places if it can't find
it where it wants, maybe.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux debian 2.4.20-k7 #1 Tue Jan 14 00:29:06 EST 2003 i686
Locale: LANG=zh_TW.Big5, LC_CTYPE=zh_TW.Big5
-- no debconf information
[Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread] |
- gmt-manpages: man (l) vs man (1) vs. e.g. emacs' M-x man,
Dan Jacobson <=